![]() 33 shows, that light pollution may affect strongly the astrophoto quality. 33 The Orion constellation – close-up view with an accidental light bow, 70mm, f2.8, 1/2s, ISO 12800. I was fighting with manual focus and with fungus also. I would like to say you, that the photos made by this Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 EX DG Macro are not good. ![]() Having 2 weeks to give this item back I took advantage of this occasion and made some tests. Besides the broken autofocus I spotted a few fungi on the bottom glass (Pic. It was a Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 EX DG Macro (Pic.1,2) rather than Sigma 17-70mm. Once I opened it I noticed, that this is not the lens, that I would like. I ordered another sigma 17-70mm f2.8 – 4.5 Macro on the same evening.Īfter a few days, the delivery has come to me. It put me in a bad mood however I didn’t want to give up. I decided to take it back to the CEX shop again. Unfortunately, the lens, that I received was not fully operational, because the autofocus was completely broken. I have ordered through the website the used Sigma 17-70mm F2.8 – 4.5 Macro lenses. Coming across many lenses and different producers I found one, tailor-made for me at first glance. These were not processed in post, just shot in Landscape picture style, and converted to jpeg in Canon's DPP.When I gave the Nikkor 18-105mm lens back to the CEX shop I decided to buy something different. This is the best compromise between image quality and focal range in my experience.I uploaded some pics I took today. Yes, you lose some quality when compared to the 24-70s, but that is pure physics. You can shoot everything from wide landscapes to head and should portraits with nice bokeh. The f/4 was very nice since it had IS, but I still missed that 105mm!I just recently purchased the Tamron 24-70 G2, which is a fantastic lens (f/2.8 and Vibration Compensation), but guess what.I missed that 105mm! So, decided to buy this lens, and after a little bit of AFMA, the lens is superb! Quick focusing, sharp images (much improved in corners), and lets in more light than the previous version.No, it doesn't have 2.8, but the IS is better than the first version, so that helps tremendously with slow moving subjects. Halloween and Christmas pics were next to impossible to get without toting a tripod around. My major disappointment with the f/2.8 II was lack of IS. I've owned the Mark I version three times, the 24-70 f/2.8 II, and the 24-70 f/4. ![]() Still Canon's best versatile zoom! Despite the less-than-glowing official reviews, this new 24-105 is a worthy purchase. DJI Mavic Mini 2/Mini 2 SE/Mini Accessories.100mm ND8+ND64+ND1000+Holder Kit - Nano-X Pro Series.100mm ND1000+Soft GND8+Holder Kit - Nano-X Pro Series.100mm ND1000+Holder Kit - Nano-X Pro Series.Light Pollution Cut Filter - Nano-X Pro.100x150mm Square Filter Protect Frame - Nano-X Pro.100x100mm Square Filter Protect Frame - Nano-X Pro.Black Mist 1/4 & CPL - Nano-X Pro Series.Ultra Thin Frame CPL Filters - Nano-K Series.Magnetic CPL + Apater ring + Cap - Nano-X.Ultra Thin Frame MCUV Filter - NANO K Series. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |